Second-Order
TRACKER
Iran Conflict Monitoring

What Changed

Five Locks

H&M Insurance SUSPENDED
P&I Club Coverage EXCLUSION ENDORSED
Cargo Insurance WITHDRAWN
Crew Consent REFUSED
Financing Covenants BLOCKED

0/5 RESTORED

Five independent commercial conditions must be met simultaneously for a vessel to transit the Strait of Hormuz. The removal of any single condition makes transit commercially unviable. Assumes no state-sponsored insurance subsidy. Closest to restoring: H&M insurance. Furthest: crew consent.

From The Insurance War

Three-Layer Chokepoint

Hormuz CLOSED (MILITARY CLEARING)
Suez / Red Sea SUSPENDED
Saudi Petroline ELEVATED THREAT → UNDER ATTACK

Three maritime routes connect Persian Gulf energy to global markets. Simultaneous disruption of all three would leave no viable export path. Hormuz: military clearing underway (130+ Iranian naval vessels destroyed), commercial transit near-zero (0/5 insurance locks restored).

From The Houthi Paradox

Houthi Escalation

RHETORIC·TARGETING·KINETIC

Houthi posture toward Red Sea and Suez shipping. No kinetic action in 20 days, yet CMA CGM has suspended Suez sailings on the threat alone. Level 2 (targeting declarations) would be a significant escalation.

From The Houthi Paradox

Bold text indicates a value that changed since the previous update.

Key Metrics

MetricCurrentBaseline
Days of conflict20Feb 28
Five Locks restored0/55/5
Ceasefire channelsUncertain
US KIA130
Iranian deaths (HRANA)3,114+0
D4: ~200 → D10: ~1,300 → D17: 3,114
Lebanon deaths9680
Israeli deaths200
Strait daily transitsNear-zero153
D1: 153 → D10: 1–3 → D20: ~0 (Western-flagged)
Ships trapped in Gulf~6500
War-risk insurance5% hull0.25%
Pre-war: 0.25% → D4: 1% → D10: 3% → D15: 5%
Hormuz statusCLOSED (CLEARING)OPEN
Iranian naval vessels destroyed130+0
Iranian BM launch rate (vs. Day 1)−90%167/day
D1: 167 → D15: 4 → D20: targeted strikes only
Iranian drone rate (vs. Day 1)−95%541/day
Ground troops in Iran00

HRANA: Human Rights Activists News Agency, independent Iranian casualty verification network. Military data from CENTCOM and IDF statements, cross-referenced against OSINT.

Commodities

CommodityCurrent
Brent crude$113.71
Pre-war: $82 → D10: $119.50 → D19: $107.38 → D20: $113.71
US gasoline$3.58/gal
Pre-war: $2.93 → D19: $3.72 → D20: $3.58
Dutch TTF€49.80/MWh
Pre-war: ~€28/MWh → D10: +76% → D20: €49.80
Urea$674/t
Pre-war: ~$490 → D10: $492 → D15: $530 → D20: $674
EU gas storage46 bcm
2024: 77 bcm → 2025: 60 bcm → D20: 46 bcm
Gold$4,602/oz
Pre-war: ~$3,050 → D15: ~$4,900 → D20: $4,602 (−6%, CME margin increase)
VIX26.65
Pre-war: ~15 → D20: 26.65 (+6.22% on day)
VLCC spot rates$423K/day
Pre-war: $50–70K/day → D20: $423K (record — non-Gulf routes)
LNG tanker rates+40%+
Ras Laffan: force majeure (D4) + physical damage (D19)
Helium supply offline~33%
Pre-war: 0% → D4: force majeure → D19: physical damage (Ras Laffan = 33% global)
Cape rerouting+112% vol.
Pre-war: baseline → D20: +112% volume, +10–14 days transit

Selected for direct disruption by the conflict. Pre-war baselines where available.

Supply Chain Risk Highlight

Helium → Semiconductor Disruption

Qatar's Ras Laffan supplies approximately 33% of global helium. EUV lithography — the process used to manufacture the most advanced semiconductors — requires helium for cooling. No commercially viable substitute exists. Taiwan's semiconductor industry sourced 69% of its helium from GCC nations in 2024. SK Hynix has disclosed a two-week operational buffer at current supply levels. Alternative sourcing from the US and Algeria can offset an estimated 50% of lost volumes.

Traces causal chains from physical disruptions to downstream economic effects. The helium-semiconductor dependency operates on a different timeline than headline energy prices.

Last updated: March 19, 2026 at 14:00 GMT. Updated daily from open-source intelligence and published reporting. This is not live data. Framework assessments are Second-Order editorial analysis. All claims cross-referenced against minimum two independent sources.

Second-Order is an independent research effort producing non-partisan geopolitical analysis, currently focused on the Iran conflict. Our work draws on publicly available sources, historical pattern recognition, and AI-assisted research to surface the structural dynamics beneath headline events. We hold no institutional affiliations. Our aim is not to advocate, but to clarify—to follow the evidence until the underlying realities, and the choices they present, come into sharper focus.

[email protected]

Signal: @secondorder.01